(bifacial vs monofacial)
Bifacial solar panels generate electricity from both sides by capturing albedo light reflection, achieving 8-20% higher energy yield compared to monofacial counterparts (NREL 2023). This dual-sided absorption requires specialized mounting systems with elevated structures (30-50cm ground clearance), increasing material costs by 12-18%. Monofacial panels maintain dominance in rooftop installations (78% market share) due to simpler installation requirements.
Field tests demonstrate bifacial modules produce 1,550 kWh/kW annually versus 1,320 kWh/kW for monofacial systems in optimal conditions. Despite 22% higher upfront costs ($0.38/W vs $0.31/W), bifacial arrays achieve ROI 2.3 years faster in utility-scale deployments. Degradation rates differ significantly:
Brand | Bifacial Model | Monofacial Model | Efficiency | Cost/Watt |
---|---|---|---|---|
LONGi | Hi-MO 6 | Hi-MO 5 | 22.8% vs 21.3% | $0.41 vs $0.34 |
Jinko | Tiger Neo | Eagle G4 | 23.2% vs 20.6% | $0.39 vs $0.32 |
Bifacial performance varies dramatically with surface reflectivity:
The 2.1 GW Al Dhafra project (UAE) combines bifacial panels with single-axis trackers, achieving record-low $0.0135/kWh PPA rates. Contrastingly, the 850 MW monofacial plant in Texas maintains 34% capacity factor through advanced cooling techniques.
Commercial adopters should evaluate three critical parameters: land costs (>$15,000/acre favors bifacial), O&M budgets (bifacial requires 18% higher maintenance), and regulatory constraints (28 markets restrict ground-mounted bifacial installations). Hybrid configurations now enable 14-19% cost savings by combining both technologies.
(bifacial vs monofacial)
A: Bifacial panels generate energy from both sides using sunlight and reflected light, while monofacial panels only utilize the front side. Bifacial panels typically yield 10-20% higher efficiency but may require specific installation conditions.
A: Yes, bifacial panels generally cost 15-30% more upfront due to dual-side technology and specialized glass. However, their increased energy output can offset the higher initial cost over time.
A: Monofacial panels are more common for rooftops due to simpler installation and cost-effectiveness. Bifacial panels work best in ground-mounted systems with reflective surfaces to maximize rear-side gains.
A: Bifacial panels capture direct sunlight on the front and reflected/ambient light on the rear. This dual absorption boosts performance, especially in environments with high albedo surfaces like snow or white gravel.
A: Both types have similar maintenance needs, but bifacial panels benefit more from regular cleaning of both surfaces. Their rear-side glass must stay clear to maintain optimal reflection benefits.